Feeling anger is part of the human condition; we all feel angry from time to time. But do you know that there are different kinds of anger? Do you know which anger the Bible approves of and which anger is considered sin? Do you know how God expects Christians to behave in each circumstance?
The Bible has some specific things to say about anger — when it’s acceptable and when it’s not and what is considered acceptable behavior when you feel anger and what is not.
Understanding the various forms of anger and what God’s Word says about how Christians should behave in each instance will serve you well at home, in your districts, and while you are working with colleagues in the Capitol Community.
In this week’s study, Befitting and Unbefitting Anger in Office, let us take a look at what God has for us regarding good and bad anger.
Ephesians chapter 4 is quite simple to understand in a cursory sense; but even though it is pretty straightforward instruction, it contains at least five profound truths that are both essential to spiritual maturity and important to thoroughly understand. Notice one of them in particular, the topic of this week’s Bible study, in Ephesians 4:26-27:
Be angry and yet do not sin; do not let the sun go down on your anger, and do not give the devil an opportunity.
Everyone deals with anger. This passage states that some anger is righteous, while other anger is sinful. As James Boice said, “It is as wrong not to be angry in a situation demanding anger, such as gross injustice, as it is to be angry at the wrong time and for the wrong reasons.”1 In addition, whichever of the two angers you feel, this passage teaches that you must deal with it swiftly, lest Satan use the delay to exploit you and through you, the body of Christ.
The second half of Ephesians addresses the behavior of the believer. Paul lists in shotgun fashion five put-off/put-on characteristics that need to characterize all believers. The practice (or lack of practice) of each of these five qualities relates to the respective health or illness of the body of Christ. In other words, your and my obedience to these behavioral commands directly impacts not only the unity of the body of Christ in our churches back home and the communities in which we live, but the health of the body of Christ in the federal Capitol as well. Accordingly, after one is saved (Paul deals with that subject heavily in chapters 1 to 3, the positional truths portion of the epistle) he or she is to live in conformity to these following five practical imperatives:
This week we will concentrate on No. 2, anger. There are four powerful insights about anger that I want us to glean from this week’s passage (4:26-27). Those truths make up this week’s outline:
II. THE SANCTION OF ANGER
There is a definite place for anger in the life of the believer. This kind of anger is commonly referred to as righteous indignation. When God’s character or attributes, His name or His Word, His will or His purposes are impugned, it is incumbent upon the believer to defend the truth. This is righteous anger over evil. As a matter of fact, to be uncrossed or complacent in the face of anger is to love not the God who saved you, who is righteous altogether (Psalm 19:9). Failure to react to manifest evil is “a sign of moral decadence and of godlessness and irreligion,” states D. Martin Lloyd Jones. It stands to reason, if we are to be Christ-like, then we too will hate sin and not tolerate it, because God hates sin. Notice how the Psalmist substantiates our need to be angry regarding sin:
Psalm 97:10: Hate evil, you who love the LORD,
Psalm 69:9: For zeal for Your house has consumed me, And the reproaches of those who reproach You have fallen on me.
Psalm 119:53: Burning indignation has seized me because of the wicked, who forsake Your law.
Given this imperative to be angry, it is not surprising that Scripture often articulates the Christian life in terms of a battle — and the believer as a soldier — fighting for the truths of Scripture, as it does in 2Timothy 2:4:
No soldier in active service entangles himself in the affairs of everyday life, so that he may please the one who enlisted him as a soldier.
Jesus, too, was such a warrior. In Mark 3:5 He expressed righteous anger over the Pharisees’ reactionary condemnation of His healing the man with the withered hand. Why? Jesus had performed this miracle on the Sabbath and He was appropriately angered over the Pharisees’ outlandish alterations of biblical commandments. In addition, Jesus cleansed God’s temple of the moneychangers not just once, but twice (cf. John 2:15, Matt. 21:12). Why? “When the holiness of God and His worship was at stake, Jesus took fast and furious action.”2 So should every believer who is a mature, avid follower of Christ when blatant, unrepentant wrong exists. As believers, we are God’s appointed ambassador (cf. 2Cor. 5:20) whom He expects to uphold and defend His righteousness in a fallen world. Such action is in keeping with the Matthew 5 concepts of Salt and Light. Being an ambassador has a lot to do with upholding truth.
DEFINITE DISPLEASURE WITH HUMAN SIN REVEALS A HEALTHY MORAL NATURE
Conversely, a lack of anger over sin is a statement about one’s moral apathy. It is an admission of spiritual laxity and immaturity.
On a personal note, it is this passage in part combined with a broader understanding of Scripture, that has over the years formed in me a righteous anger over the misuse of Scripture, and over the diminution of the Gospel’s acknowledged authority in the Capitol communities of America. Contending for the faith ( Jude 3) should be a part of every believer’s life; any believer who is not willing to wage battles for what is right is not worthy of his or her calling. One Christian lyricist put it best, “The mark of a godly man is what he is fighting for . . .”
In summary of this portion of the passage, “Paul is placing a moral obligation on believers to be angry as the occasion requires.”4 Accordingly, it is biblical for believers to be angry as long as that anger stems from a selfless, righteous response to scripturally explicit error and/or injustice.5
If this is the motive that underlies the Christian activist who in earnest, desires to change policy for the sake of God’s glory and the betterment of the country, then he or she should be loudly applauded by all believers! These are those who are motivated by a righteous indignation and possess a proper understanding of this scriptural concept.
III. THE SHIRKING OF ANGER
and yet do not sin
Sinful anger is quite different from righteous anger. Dishonorable anger is selfish and it appears when one does not get his way. The imperative command implied in our verse under study is that we are to put off this kind of anger which stems from impure motives of pride, malice, revenge, and resentment. Furthermore, sinful anger is self-defensive and self-serving and is characterized by everything from “passionate outbursts to the sullen bearing of grudges.”6 Obviously, this kind of anger destroys unity in the body of Christ. When you or I experience sinful anger, we are failing to live according to our new nature in Christ which was imputed to us by the Holy Spirit at the time of our salvation. Rather than putting off the old man, we are living according to his decrepit nature. Conversely, Scripture says in Galatians 2:20:
“I have been crucified with Christ and it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me.”
In other words, our old nature is dead — so why resurrect it as is evidenced by bad anger? When you are angry for sinful reasons you are choosing to behave according to your old crucified nature. It follows that any Christian activist who is characterized by these vitriolic, acerbic motives and actions should not be applauded.
I can vividly remember a time when I sat in on a committee hearing and listened to a legislator who regularly attended and publicly identified with our Bible study/ministry in the California Capitol. He went off on an ad-hominem rage denouncing another legislator over his supposed incompetence — an unbelieving legislator who had visited the Bible study several times. I thought in my heart, “Well, he’ll never be back.” Sure enough I was right. Believers are not to be bad-tempered, irritable and irascible (meaning “easily incensed”) people; such antics are characteristic of the old, pre-Christ self ! States 1Corinthians 13:5, Christians should not be those who are easily provoked. An anger problem equates to a hugely bad testimony and drastically harms the corporate witness of the body of Christ, to say nothing of the loss of momentum for all ministries in the Capitol. The clear imperative of Scripture is to put off this kind of anger. Shirk it in yourself and others.
IV. THE SETTING-UP OF ANGER
do not let the sun go down on your anger
This stanza of our passage does not mean that you have a biblical license to be angry until sunset. Nor should it be interpreted with a wooden literalism, otherwise mountaineers who are mad with their climbing partners during a summer ascent of Mount McKinley would have weeks until they needed to reconcile as compared to a climbing team on the same day in Patagonia who would possess only minutes to reconcile lest they find themselves dishonoring this passage.7 The prevailing principle of this passage’s Pauline prose is that anger should be dealt with in short order — swiftly and promptly. Author Paul was Jewish and the Jewish day ended at sunset. “Sunset was regarded as a time limit for a range of activities, for example, the paying of a poor man his wages lest by failing to do so one would be guilty of sinning (Deut. 24:15).”8 In other words, one should deal with anger soon after it arises lest bitterness and resentment set in.
“THE DAY OF ANGER SHOULD BE THE DAY OF RECONCILIATION”9
This quote is a good way of understanding and remembering the principle being taught in this passage. There should be no prolonging of problems that need resolution, no brooding or nursing of a hurt. Anger, be it just or unjust, should be dealt with immediately.
Having stated that, a prompt seeking of resolution doesn’t mean one will always work out the problems related to his anger even though Romans 12:18 commands believers, If possible, so far as it depends on you, be at peace with all men, peace with others nonetheless remains dependent on the other party’s attitudes of pride versus humility and other factors. For instance, does the other party desire to continue to cover up his activity, or does he desire to come clean and be transparent? The point is this: . . . so far as it depends on you . . . do not let the sun go down on your anger. We all know that reconciliation is a two-way street; don’t allow bad anger to set-up and jell in your heart.
V. THE SECURING OF ANGER
and do not give the devil an opportunity.
Lastly, this passage states the reason why every believer needs to deal quickly with righteous or unrighteous anger. The word for opportunity is topos. It is the same word we use for topography and means “location or place.” If we fail to deal quickly with anger, we allow Satan the opportunity to gain a foothold, location or place within you and the body of believers. This is not to suggest that Satan can indwell a believer; I do not think Scripture ever teaches that. “Do not give the devil a chance to exert his influence”10 is a good understanding of the meaning of this passage.
Believers are in a spiritual battle. One of the greatest God-given weapons that Christians possess to defeat the whims of the devil and build God’s Kingdom is the corporate unity of the body of Christ. This unity amongst believers, while often overlooked and unmeasured, is a significant, formidable force, which God intends for His ambassadors to utilize in order to achieve His purposes. States Jesus in this regard in a conversation with Father God in John 17:23:
I in them and You in Me, that they may be perfected in unity, so that the world may know that You sent Me, and loved them, even as You have loved Me.
Jesus says that the reason for unity is so that the world may know. Know what? That God the Father sent Jesus the Son to be their Savior! This is the best means for effectively evangelizing the lost in our nation’s Capitol! And Satan knows it! Accordingly, it is his plan to attack and destroy the unity of the body of Christ — in order to hinder and disrupt the corporate witness on the Hill that Jesus is the Savior — so that the world will not know!
So how does Satan go about unplugging God’s grand design and circuitry? Bad anger in the believer is a regular avenue and antic that he attempts to exploit — and often does successfully — so as to disrupt the unity of believers and short circuit the power of our corporate evangelistic effort. Bad anger is the way in which Satan gains opportunity, a place in our midst (but not in us), if we are not careful. Therefore, be vigilant to put off unrighteous anger and put on righteous anger.
Could this be what Paul meant at the end of his ministry when he says, “I have fought the good fight” (2Tim. 4:7) versus in any way being involved in incestuous infighting — filled with bad anger toward other brothers and sisters in Christ? Fighting for righteousness, possessing a righteous anger versus a bad kind of anger is not only good for your own spiritual well-being and outlook, but it effectuates the fitness and ensuing power of the corporate body of Christ here on the mission field of our nation’s Capitol. Please do not underestimate the profundity of what Jesus is teaching here or naively diminish your overall responsibility in this regard! Make sure you put bad anger far away from yourself. Amen.
2 John MacArthur, Gen. Ed. The MacArthur Study Bible (Nashville: Word, 1997) p. 1579, 2:15.
3 Exodus 21:23-24 is reiterated by Jesus in Matthew 5:38.
4 Earnest Best The International Critical Commentary: Ephesians (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1998) p. 449
5 It is interesting to further note that one of the primary tenants of the Neo-Evangelical movement in their attempt to eclipse militant Fundamentalism in the late 1940s (which was strong in displaying a righteous indignation in response to the liberal protestant takeover and diminishing of Scripture in American Christianity from 1865 to 1915) was an insistence on “positivism and not negativism.” Harold Ockenga said in his commencement speech on the founding of Fuller Theological Seminary, one of the centers of Neo-Evangelical thinking, “Our [students] will have no time for that kind of negativism. We want the positive presentation of the Christian faith . . .” With such a foundational attitude there was no way one could later criticize (which was interpreted as negativism) encroaching theological error in their own institution! Accordingly, within one generation the seminary abandoned a high view of Scripture and today continues to drift further and further from its biblical moorings. (Quote excerpted from the Fuller Seminary Archives, The Convocation address of President Harold Ockenga, Pasadena Civic Auditorium, October 1, 1947.) Quickly the truths of Scripture can be lost if no one is willing to be properly angry when they are diminished in any way.
6 E. Best, p. 449.
7 Located in the northern hemisphere, high on the mountain in the summer, the sun never really sets due to the extreme latitude and altitude of Mt. McKinley, versus the length of a similar day in Patagonia, located near the tip of South America.
8 Peter T. O’Brien, Gen. Ed. The Pillar New Testament Commentary: The Letter to the Ephesians (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1999) p. 340.
9 This was the interpretive summary of John Eadie who wrote his commentary on Ephesians in 1854 after reading and referencing over 100 previous commentaries on the same.
10 O’Brien, p. 340.